SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.—Inside the Hyatt Regency at Gainey Ranch, the luxurious resort on the outskirts of Phoenix, dozens of the most powerful people in college sports milled, parading through the vast lobby and sunning themselves on the terrace. But most landed in the depths of conference boardrooms, searching for answers to what has become the latest seismic dilemma in the industry: the rapidly escalating donor-driven bidding war for football players. college and men’s basketball.
“This is the moment when we have to put our bet on the ground. Enough! This is not acceptable,” says frustrated Colorado athletic director Rick George. “What we are doing is not good for intercollegiate athletics and it has to stop.”
College leaders strongly urge the NCAA enforcement team to begin investigating what they see as obvious recruiting violations, past and present. Donor-led collectives that have struck deals with players before they sign binding letters of intent are breaking the rules, says George, one of the leaders of an NCAA task force that will soon release additional NIL guidelines.
Additional NIL guidelines, which are currently being finalized by the NCAA task force, are expected to help regulate these deals that officials say encourage current players to stay on their teams and induce recruits to sign with their schools, a developing situation. Sports Illustrated Detailed Monday. On Tuesday, SI reported on the imminent release of the guidelines, which could happen as early as next week. George and Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith, also on the task force, confirmed the existence of the draft guidelines.
The guidance clarifies existing NCAA statutes that prohibit reinforcements from participating in the draft. Any promoter or promoter-led collective that associated with recruiting prospects, on another college team or in high school, will be found to have violated NCAA rules and put the promoter’s school at risk of sanctions, George says. In addition, a promoter, or groups led by promoters, “may not contact a student-athlete or other persons affiliated with a student-athlete to encourage them to remain enrolled or attend an institution.”
“The fact that we have NIL doesn’t remove the rules,” says George. “Everyone says ‘It’s NIL!’ I’m all for NIL well done. Is very good. [Athletes] You should be able to monetize your NIL, but a lot of what’s going on isn’t NIL.”
Since the NIL concept began last July, university officials say there is well-documented evidence that boosters and collectives have made deals with prospects, many surprising deals before recruits sign on with their new school. There is evidence that some promoters are even putting prospects up in their homes and taking them on campus tours, which is in violation of the NCAA, leaders say.
“What’s happening now, I just know what I’m hearing, is that the incentives break the rules,” says Smith. “Hopefully this will happen on Monday and give more clarity and guidelines. But then, [NCAA] the app has to enforce. Schools must also enforce it. At the end of the day, you have an institutional responsibility to enforce.”
The guidelines introduce more clarity into an interim NIL policy that provided only vague guidance that proponents are now sidestepping. If violations are found in the last 10 months since NIL first started, those schools will be sanctioned.
“One hundred percent will,” George said. “We have to look at these agreements. The NCAA has to look at them, and if they’re not within our guidelines, hold them accountable and be firm.”
Law enforcement personnel should be “ready to go” once the guidelines are released, says another Power 5 sports director who requested anonymity. “They need to hit them and hit them hard and fast.”
However, it can be tricky.
NCAA enforcement has been less willing and perhaps unable to enforce existing statutes, George and Smith say. For one thing, the organization is concerned that any app will trigger a series of antitrust legal challenges. Second, the NCAA’s enforcement staff is not well equipped for a large-scale national investigation. It has dropped between 15 and 20 members due to layoffs due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Smith says the association plans to eventually replace the people.
In a warning shot to the NCAA itself, Pac-12 Commissioner George Kliavkoff told SI on Wednesday that if the NCAA doesn’t start enforcing existing bylaws, leaders will find a workaround, but he didn’t specify which ones. could be those solutions. Amid the uncertainty, Kliavkoff and SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey traveled to Washington DC on Thursday to meet with key US senators in hopes of further encouraging them to pass the federal NIL legislation, which many believe will be the only practical solution to the latest mess, but unlikely. to spend this year.
Scroll to Continue
The NCAA’s enforcement staff’s situation in not going after violators deeply “is the biggest problem” the organization has, says George. But industry insiders say any app will invariably draw lawsuits from wealthy donors. Given last summer’s Supreme Court loss in the Alston case and a bevy of state laws protecting boosters themselves, what can the NCAA really do?
“If they punish kids, they’ll have lawyers lining up,” says Arizona sports attorney Greg Clifton. “There will be a class action suit within 48 hours.”
Booster collectives have struck hundreds of deals since last July, with many of the donor-led groups already raising more than $5 million in a pseudo-player salary fund labeled NIL. Boosters who spoke with SI say they comply with their respective state laws governing NIL and/or NCAA interim policy and have evidence to back it up.
“The NCAA has always said no pay-per-play and no incentives, and that’s what we’re seeing,” says Tom McMillen, president of LEAD1, an organization that represents FBS athletic directors. “The NCAA could fall apart and… I just don’t know how you end deals. What are the enforcement mechanisms? Make children ineligible?
Many promoters and collectives are managed by platforms such as Opendorse that ensure that they comply with the tracking of all athlete transactions. Several are managed by expert sports agents and attorneys who have preserved documentation of their communication and quid pro quos.
“I think if the NCAA can go after schools in some way based on what the collectives are doing as representatives of a school’s athletic interests, that could stop some of the incentive stuff that’s going on right now.” He says. Mit Winter, sports lawyer who advises various groups. “But if the NCAA declares an athlete ineligible, a lawsuit is likely to follow. The same with the promoters and the collectives”.
A plague on the NCAA for years, potential litigation was the main reason the association abandoned plans last summer to implement a more permanent policy governing NIL, opening the door for wealthy donors to creatively maneuver around guidelines. vague provisionals.
Now, as boosters of elite Power 5 programs bankroll football teams in a high-price bidding war, the organization is shifting into attack mode. It raises more questions than it answers.
“Whether it’s possible to undo the buzzer remains to be seen,” says Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowlsby, who is also part of the task force. “It seems like we would have been infinitely better off if we had gone ahead and implemented the railings.”
George and several administrators were against the NCAA’s decision to avoid permanent politics. “We shouldn’t have abandoned it,” he says. At the urging of the NCAA legal team and in a plan proposed by Commissioners Sankey and Jim Phillips (ACC), as well as four other league executives, the plan was postponed.
“We pulled the cops off the road and now they’re all going 90 miles an hour,” says Smith. “Now we are trying to get officers back on the road.”
Will vehicles slow down?
“I don’t think every constituency decides, ‘OK, let’s listen to the NCAA now,’” says Winter. “With all the time and money they’ve spent putting them together, they’re not going to want to stop. It’s a really interesting situation.”
More college sports coverage: